<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Police SUV Carbon Monoxide Poisoning Fourth Reported Case in Austin, TX	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://carbonmonoxide.com/2017/05/police-suv-carbon-monoxide-poisoning-fourth-reported-case-austin-tx.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://carbonmonoxide.com/2017/05/police-suv-carbon-monoxide-poisoning-fourth-reported-case-austin-tx.html</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 19:41:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Attorney Gordon Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://carbonmonoxide.com/2017/05/police-suv-carbon-monoxide-poisoning-fourth-reported-case-austin-tx.html#comment-461</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Attorney Gordon Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 15:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://carbonmonoxide.com/?p=3051#comment-461</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://carbonmonoxide.com/2017/05/police-suv-carbon-monoxide-poisoning-fourth-reported-case-austin-tx.html#comment-459&quot;&gt;Albert Donnay, CO Toxicologist&lt;/a&gt;.

Thank you Albert. Good hearing from you. I completely concur about the unacceptable standard range of alarming in detectors. The portable detectors are best.

Attorney Gordon Johnson]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://carbonmonoxide.com/2017/05/police-suv-carbon-monoxide-poisoning-fourth-reported-case-austin-tx.html#comment-459">Albert Donnay, CO Toxicologist</a>.</p>
<p>Thank you Albert. Good hearing from you. I completely concur about the unacceptable standard range of alarming in detectors. The portable detectors are best.</p>
<p>Attorney Gordon Johnson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Albert Donnay, CO Toxicologist		</title>
		<link>https://carbonmonoxide.com/2017/05/police-suv-carbon-monoxide-poisoning-fourth-reported-case-austin-tx.html#comment-459</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Albert Donnay, CO Toxicologist]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 May 2017 13:18:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://carbonmonoxide.com/?p=3051#comment-459</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I am surprised this post does not mention that the exhaust leak in Ford Explorers is the subject of a class action lawsuit covering 2011-2015 model years.  As of May 2017, a settlement is pending in which Ford is offering owners two rounds of repair, including replacing the exhaust system, but not promising that either repair will stop the problem, which Ford still refuses to issue a recall for.  The same &quot;odor problem&quot; is also being reported in 2016 and 2017 vehicles, as CBS and others first reported back in February, 2017, but no lawyers have yet taken up their case.     

see http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ford-explorer-lawsuits-exhaust-leak-carbon-monoxide/ 

Unfortunately, the solution discussed in this blog of putting a CO detector in a vehicle may not prevent CO poisoning.  If it&#039;s a UL-listed home CO detector, it won&#039;t alarm unless CO has been continuously over 70 ppm for 1-4 hours, or at the high end, over 400 for 4 -15 minutes.  The &quot;detectors&quot; being installed by Austin PD are even worse, just paper &quot;spots&quot; that change color irreversibly when exposed to CO over time.  

Drivers concerned about being CO poisoned while in their vehicle should carry a portable CO detector with a digital display that can be set to alarm immediately, without delay, at any preset level.  (I recommend alarming above the US EPA outdoor limit of 9ppm, which is more than 10 times the current US outdoor average to which most people are habituated).   These cost $100-$200 in USA but less than $50 in UK.  See for example the Fire Angel 9D model at http://fireangel.co.uk/products/carbon-monoxide-alarms/co-9d/   (I have no affiliation)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised this post does not mention that the exhaust leak in Ford Explorers is the subject of a class action lawsuit covering 2011-2015 model years.  As of May 2017, a settlement is pending in which Ford is offering owners two rounds of repair, including replacing the exhaust system, but not promising that either repair will stop the problem, which Ford still refuses to issue a recall for.  The same &#8220;odor problem&#8221; is also being reported in 2016 and 2017 vehicles, as CBS and others first reported back in February, 2017, but no lawyers have yet taken up their case.     </p>
<p>see <a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ford-explorer-lawsuits-exhaust-leak-carbon-monoxide/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.cbsnews.com/news/ford-explorer-lawsuits-exhaust-leak-carbon-monoxide/</a> </p>
<p>Unfortunately, the solution discussed in this blog of putting a CO detector in a vehicle may not prevent CO poisoning.  If it&#8217;s a UL-listed home CO detector, it won&#8217;t alarm unless CO has been continuously over 70 ppm for 1-4 hours, or at the high end, over 400 for 4 -15 minutes.  The &#8220;detectors&#8221; being installed by Austin PD are even worse, just paper &#8220;spots&#8221; that change color irreversibly when exposed to CO over time.  </p>
<p>Drivers concerned about being CO poisoned while in their vehicle should carry a portable CO detector with a digital display that can be set to alarm immediately, without delay, at any preset level.  (I recommend alarming above the US EPA outdoor limit of 9ppm, which is more than 10 times the current US outdoor average to which most people are habituated).   These cost $100-$200 in USA but less than $50 in UK.  See for example the Fire Angel 9D model at <a href="http://fireangel.co.uk/products/carbon-monoxide-alarms/co-9d/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://fireangel.co.uk/products/carbon-monoxide-alarms/co-9d/</a>   (I have no affiliation)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Minified using Disk
Database Caching 49/64 queries in 0.075 seconds using Disk

Served from: carbonmonoxide.com @ 2026-04-12 16:13:34 by W3 Total Cache
-->